IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Present: Mr.Ramashankar and Mr.Rakesh Mehta, Advocates for the petitioner.
Mr.Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr.P.D. Gupta and Mr.Kamal Gupta, Advocates for the respondent No.1.
Mr.Manish Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent No.2 and 3.
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 seeks more time to file the
reply to show cause notice. Reply to show cause notice be filed within two
weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing. The learned counsel for respondent No.1 has pointed out that the rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of petitioner to the counter affidavit of respondent No.1 stipulates that the parents are ready to pay the enhanced fee under the heads, tuition fee, admission fee, caution money and development charges, annual charges without enhancement, however, the main bone of contention is the charges of activity fee, art and craft orientation fee, computer fee and orientation fee.
In view of the averments made by the petitioner, the fee as has been indicated by them be paid by the parents without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties.
Lists on October 7, 2009.
August 27, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J.